We are bounded in a nutshell of Infinite Space: Week 11: Worksheet #20: Problem #1: This is where you live
1.
a.
b. For this
problem, we are attempting to find the range of the distance around a star in
which a planet may have liquid water, what we know as the habitable zone. In
order to understand this, we must find the correlation of temperature and the brightness
of stellar objects. For a planet, we know the Flux it receives from the star it
orbits is: \[ \frac{L_\star}{4\pi a^2} =
F_P ,\] which can be re written to better represent all the energy impacting
the planet in a specified time: \[ F = \frac{Energy}{time \cdot area}\] \[ \frac{L_\star}{4\pi
a^2} \cdot \pi R_P^2 = \frac{Energy}{time}~received~by~planet\]
Furthermore,
we should understand the energy the planet then radiates back into space, which
can be described with the equation for bolometric flux: \[F = \sigma T_P^4,\] and
from previous worksheets we know that the flux can be turned into luminosity by
just multiplying by the surface area \[ L_P = \sigma T_P^4 \cdot 4\pi R_P^2\]
c. Next we
set these equations equal to each other and find the expression for the
temperature of the planet: \[ \frac{L_\star}{4\pi a^2} \cdot \pi R_P^2 = \frac{Energy}{time}~received~by~planet
= L_P = \sigma T_P^4 \cdot 4\pi R_P^2\] \[
\frac{L_\star}{4\pi
a^2} \cdot \pi R_P^2 = \sigma T_P^4 \cdot 4\pi R_P^2,\] we start simplifying
the equation and find that \[ \frac{L_\star}{4a^2} = \sigma T_P^4 \cdot 4\pi ,\]
which finally turns into: \[ T_P = \left(\frac{L_\star}{16 a^2 \pi \sigma}\right)^{1/4}\]
Also, we
can keep on simplifying the expression were we to consider the definition of
the star’s luminosity: \[L_\star = 4\pi R_\star^2 \cdot \sigma T_{eff}^4,\]
which can be placed into the equation we just derived to further understand the
factors involved: \[ T_P = \left(\frac{4\pi R_\star^2 \cdot \sigma T_{eff}^4}{16
a^2 \pi \sigma}\right)^{1/4},\] \[ T_P = \left(\frac{ R_\star^2 T_{eff}^4}{4
a^2 }\right)^{1/4},\] This results in the simplified version of the equation
which expresses the relationship between the planet’s temperature, and the radius
and temperature of the star: \[ T_P = T_{eff} \sqrt{\frac{R_\star}{2a}}\]
d. As we
can see from the equations, the radius of the planet becomes insignificant, it
not being a factor in establishing the temperature of the planet, rather the
radius of the star comes into play.
e. Now, we
can assume some energy gets reflected from the surface, yielding an equation
similar to: \[ T_P = \left(\frac{L_\star}{16 a^2 \pi \sigma}\right)^{1/4},\]
but where A is the energy per time
reflected: \[ T_P = \left(\frac{L_\star - A}{16 a^2 \pi \sigma}\right)^{1/4},\]
which simplifies to: \[ T_P = T_{eff} \sqrt{\frac{R_\star}{2a}} - \left(\frac{A}{16
a^2 \pi \sigma}\right)^{1/4}.\] Therefore, the temperature most definitely goes
down as the reflectivity increases.
Your expression for (e) is incorrect. The factor A is not an absolute amount of energy but rather a fraction of energy reflected. In other words, A is some number between 0 and 1.
ReplyDeleteThat means that the energy received by the planet from the sun is scaled by a factor of (1-A) which then propagates through the calculation.
The factor A is called "Albedo" if you wanted to look into it further.