We are bounded in
a nutshell of Infinite Space: Worksheet # 5, Problem #2: Let’s get into the
math of Stellar Temperatures
2. Blackbodies are
nice because they’re such simple objects. Their outward appearance is entirely
determined by their temperature. If there were cows in space, astronomers would
imagine them to be spherical blackbodies (and seriously, it wouldn’t be a bad
approximation). In this exercise we’ll take advantage of the relative
simplicity of blackbodies to derive some useful expressions that you’ll use
this term, and throughout tour astronomy career.
a. In astronomy, it is often
useful to deal with something called the “bolometric flux”, ot the energy per
area per time, independent of frequency. Integrate the blackbody flux Fν(T) over all the frequencies to obtain
the bolometric flux emitted from a blackbody, F(T). You can do this using u substitution for
the variable u≡hv/kT .
This will allow you to split thing s into a temperature dependent term, and a
term comprising an integral over all frequencies. However, rather than solving
for the integral, just set all the constants to a new, single constant called σ
, which is also known as the Stefan-Boltzmann
constant, and retain the dependence on the temperature T. If you’re really into calculus, go ahead and show that σ≈5.7×10−5erg s−1 cm−2 K−4. Otherwise, commit this number to
memory.
b. The Wein Displacement Law:
Convert the units of the blackbody intensity from Bν(T) to Bλ(T) IMPORTANT: Remember that the amount of
energy in a frequency interval dν has to be exactly equal to the amount of energy in the corresponding
wavelength interval dλ.
c. Derive the expression for
the wavelength λmax corresponding to the peak of the intensity distribution at a given
temperature T. (HINT: How do you
find the maximum of a function? Once you do this, again substitute u≡hν/kT ). The expression you
end up with will be transcendental, but you can solve it easily to the first
order, which is good enough for this exercise.
d. The Rayleigh-Jeans Tail:
Next, let’s consider photon energies that are much smaller than the thermal
energy. Use a first-order Taylor expansion on the term ehνkT
to derive a simplified form of
Bν(T) in this low-energy regime.
(HINT: The Taylor Expansion of ex≈1+x .)
e. Write an expression for the
total power output of a blackbody with a radius R, starting with the expression
for Fν. This
total energy output per unit time is also known as the bolometric luminosity,
L.
a) As we have seen in less detail at other points,
blackbodies are a good approximation for most objects in the universe. The most
“perfect” blackbody we have found is actually the CMB (Cosmic Microwave Background),
the afterglow of the Big Bang. Based on a relationship between the
frequency/wavelength of the observed light and the temperature of the light, we
find an equation which can relate these two, as well as be derived and
anti-derived to give broader descriptions.
From a previous problem, we know that a description
of the Flux of a blackbody, any object which absorbs and releases thermal
radiation, is represented by: Fν(T)=2πc2ν3hehν/kT−1, so if we integrate over all possible frequencies, going
to infinity, we have: ∫∞0Fν(T)=2πhc2∫∞0ν3ehν/kT−1dν, where we can substitute u=hνkT and ukTh=ν as well as du=hkT, into F(T)=∫∞0(kTh)u3eu−1(kTh)du which can be more easily integrated once the
constants are completely separated: F(T)=2πhc2(kTh)4∫∞0u3eu−1du, and
knowing a particular integration of a strange equation, this all becomes much
easier ∫∞0u3eu−1du=π415 F(T)=2πk4c2h3T4⋅π415. As is stated in the
problem, all the constants can be grouped together and you would find that we
come remarkably close to the actual value of the Stefan-Boltzmann constant, although I suspect
we would get a closer value were we to complete the integration by ourselves,
as difficult as that may be. Nevertheless, the constants all become a single
term, which simplifies the Bolometric Flux equation into: F(T)=σT4
b) From the problem, we know we are simply
converting the specific intensity according to frequency, to specific intensity
according to wavelength. Therefore, if they are both the same value, but in
different metrics, they can simply be equaled to the other and then attempt to
integrate both, with parameters which leave us with their derivatives with
respect to the parameter: −Bλdλ=Bνdν, (we add a negative sign to establish how they are inversely proportional) and by placing
all on one side: −Bλ=−Bνdνdλ, and after simplifying it down: Bλ=Bνdνdλ, we just find the derivative of ν=cλ in terms of λ: Bλ=Bν cλ2,
and so applying it to the original intensity equation (remember to change all ν’s
into c/λ) : Bλ=2hc2λ51ehc/λkT–1.
c) Now, to maximize the equation, we have to derive
the function and set it equal to ): d Bλdλ=d2hc2λ51ehc/λkT–1dλ, which can now be interpreted with partial fractions
(only deriving with respect to a specific variable: ∂Bλ∂dλ=∂Bλ∂u∂u∂λ
and thus we can define u as u=hckTλ, and we place thisn
into the equation and get: Bu=2hc2(ukThc)5eu–1, and now we take the derivative
with respect to u on both sides and get (with
some separation of constants and application of the product rule): dBudu=2hc2(kthc)5(5u4(eu−1)–u5(eu)), so we now take
it and optimize it by setting it to 0: 0=2hc2(kthc)5(5u4(eu−1)–u5(eu)), we
eliminate all the constants and begin solving the equation: 5u4(eu−1)=u5 eu 5=ueueu−1, and now we can make a first order
expansion and simplify the equation: 5=ueueu 5=u
Knowing what we defined to be u: u=hckTλ
and solved to find λ, we see: λ=hcukT, and now
we define our constants, the Plank constant: h=6.63×10−27erg⋅s, Boltzmann’s constant: k=1.38×10−16erg/K, and the speed
of light: c=3×1010cm/s,
we solve and find that: λmax=6.63×10−27erg⋅s⋅3×1010cm/s5⋅1.38×10−16erg/K⋅T
λmax=0.29cm⋅KT
d) This part of the problem is simply using a basic
equation and expanding it to see how it acts in small frequencies, Bν(T)=2ν3hc2(ehν/kT−1) and the expansion is given to us as:
ex≈1+x which, plugged in, would just be: Bν(T)=2ν3hc211+hνkT−1, and thus we are left with: Bν(T)=2ν3hc21hνkT
e) Now, just applying what we learned in part a),
we know howFν(T)=2πc2ν3hehν/kT−1,
can be integrated over all frequencies and we find: F(T)=σT4,then,
we have to understand how Flux is distributed isotopically. This means we have
to understand the entire area, this being: A=∫2π0∫π0R2sinθdθdϕ A=∫2π02R2dϕ A=4πR2 So by multiplying both sides of the F(T)
equation by the complete area of the light expansion, we have: 4πR2F=4πR2σT4, and Flux in all directions at all times is simply the
Luminosity, as such: L=4πR2σT4, the relationship between
Luminosity and Temperature.
For 2b), you lost a negative sign when taking the derivative of wavelength w.r.t. frequency. In the end, you got the right answer, because there is a second negative sign you missed! Can you reconcile the two negative signs? Hint: B\nu d\nu = -B\lambda d\lambda because we want energy to be positive when we integrate from small wavelength to larger wavelength.
ReplyDeleteHi Pierre, I believe I reconciled both negative signs now (I was basing myself on a correction for the negative sign described in Astronomy in a Nutshell). If there is anything else I should do beyond telling you here, please let me know. Thanks!
Delete